Branson

The headline of 2013 that no one ever saw: “$45M plus 7 years of TCED/Chamber CVB Branson marketing results in $7.8M 2014 Plan to get back to the basics and re-engage Branson’s core markets”

Wow, that’s some marketing efficiency; Over $45M spent to realize that we have to “get back to basics” and “re-engage our core markets.” That’s nuts! Wouldn’t it have been great if the same marketing brilliance being displayed now could have been displayed three or four years ago at about the $21M or $30M mark? That’s a rhetorical question because, in an Ole Seagull’s opinion, the same marketing brilliance and desire for control that led Branson into this position, as embodied in the incestuous relationship between leadership of the “Tourism Community Enhancement District” (TCED) and the “Branson Lakes Area CVB” (CVB), is still “lighting” the way into the future. (Don’t panic folks, as used herein the term “incestuous” is defined as “a relationship excessively close and resistant to outside influence.”) …

The headline of 2013 that no one ever saw: “$45M plus 7 years of TCED/Chamber CVB Branson marketing results in $7.8M 2014 Plan to get back to the basics and re-engage Branson’s core markets” Read More »

Who Else Wants a 25% Raise, LUV or more Christmas?

OK so most of us aren’t going to get a 25% pay raise, but we can enjoy, by proxy, the 25% pay raise that Taney County’s elected officials voted themselves to hopefully get in 2015. It does not go into effect until 2015, but does it take a Solomon to figure out who will be lined up to run in 2015? “But Seagull, in these economic times while things are so tough for everyone, how could they, in good conscience do that?” All an Ole Seagull can say is that, “In terms of their collective “conscience,” their action speaks for itself.” Does that include Presiding Commissioner Ron Houseman who was absent for the vote?” That just has to be a rhetorical question? …

Who Else Wants a 25% Raise, LUV or more Christmas? Read More »

Could it be “Three strikes and you’re out” even with the Taney County 911 Retail Sales Tax

Strike 1. No civilian member on an unelected 911 Board responsible to no one, but themselves legislated by themselves for themselves – If the tax is passed, by statute, a 911 Board is appointed, not elected, which specifically excludes the appointment of a civilian member. Even worse that appointed Board “shall have the power provided in section 190.339 and shall exercise all powers and duties exercised by the county commission under this chapter, and the commission shall relinquish all powers and duties relating to the provision of emergency services under this chapter to the board.” (RSMo 190.335(12)). …

Could it be “Three strikes and you’re out” even with the Taney County 911 Retail Sales Tax Read More »

Will the 911 sky fall down if voters reject quarter-cent sales tax hike in November?

One’s first instinct is to say “Hey 911 is a necessary service, the tourists will pay most of it, so let’s vote for it.” Folks, on any retail sales tax “tourists,” as a whole will pay the majority of the total taxes collected because there are millions of them, but on a day to day basis, over the period of a year, those of us living in Branson and Taney County will, on an individual basis, pay more simply because we live and shop here every day and pay the tax day after day. …

Will the 911 sky fall down if voters reject quarter-cent sales tax hike in November? Read More »

Does quality of the Marketing of Branson shows = the quality of Branson shows?

Not by a long shot! In the last paragraph of his last column entitled “What’s ‘damming’ Branson shows, prices, marketing or …,’ available on line at www.TheOleSeagull.Com, the Ole Seagull said “he believes, as to Branson’s shows, the current marketing efforts on their behalf is uninspired and totally inadequate to market them in the effective manner that something so vital to Branson’s past and future financial success deserves.”

That is based on his belief that “Branson’s shows are one of the ‘tripod’ legs that underpins Branson’s economic foundation and makes Branson the unique travel destination it is. Its shows, along with Silver Dollar City and the natural beauty of the surrounding Ozark Mountains with their pristine lakes, all combine to provide something unique and special that is found… nowhere else on earth.  What happens to a tripod if one leg is removed?”

For what it’s worth, he believes that, from an out of area stand point, the marketing required for Branson’s shows is different from that required for the other two legs of the tripod. Briefly, Silver Dollar City has spent decades and millions of dollars building a brand and icons that that people will generally recognize when shown as part of a TV spot advertisement or in a publication. Basically the same can be said for the beauty of our Ozark Hills and lakes, people see them briefly in a TV Spot or in a publication and can relate to them.

The same approach for Branson’s shows, particularly individual shows, doesn’t work as effectively. How effective is a picture of a Branson entertainer, as part of a short TV Spot that covers everything from golfing, lakes, Silver Dollar City, the Titanic Museum Attraction, lakes, etc? Has any study been done to see just how effective these spots and, even to a certain extent the show spots where they flash from one show to another during the spot, are in causing potential Branson visitors to want see a show in Branson?

The Ole Seagull has been told, “You point out what is wrong, but what would you do to fix it?” To start, in order, here’s where he would place his emphasis in terms of CVB marketing dollars:

1. Give priority to Branson’s Resident shows, those open during the majority of the season, in the vast majority of the CVB marketing. It is these who make Branson’s live entertainment what it is. We have the talent in Branson that if properly marketed will not only bring people to Branson for decades to come, but create the “stars” necessary to do it.” Let the promoters, Branson receptives, ticket sellers and others promote the “limited engagement” shows, but use CVB marketing dollars to build and promote the base of Resident shows that will be here the majority of the year.

2. Make more efficient use of the CVB marketing funds that are available by, among other things, trying to multiply every dollar of marketing funds spent; more efficient monitoring of and keeping administrative fees low; coordinating with others providing services that CVB’s marketing dollars are being used to duplicate in an effort to reduce such expenditures and use those funds for the direct marketing of Branson shows and everything else that Branson what it offers.

3. Think out of the box! Try something new such as immediately starting steps to produce a 30 minute weekly Branson TV show featuring presentations by a different Branson Resident show each week along with other Branson information. The emphasis would be on letting people see actual performances by different Branson shows to help educate them as to the breadth and quality of the live entertainment Branson offers. It doesn’t take a marketing Solomon, as evidenced by two of Branson’s most successful shows, “Presleys’ Country Jubilee” and the “Haygoods,” to see the impact that TV, directed to the right demographics, can have on an individual show and, the Ole Seagull believes, could have on Branson Shows in general.

“Now hold on Seagull stop right there, you’ve gone too far. Do you know how much a TV show like that would cost?” “Actually, ‘No,’ but how much would it cost to gather some preliminary information and estimates to see how much it would cost to get Branson entertainers to perform on the show, possibly work out a cooperative marketing agreement with a network like RFD TV and produce such a show?”

Now here’s a thought, “If Branson’s shows are the third leg of the tripod, what could it cost Branson if we don’t think out of the box in terms of marketing Branson shows and continue down the same old path we have always traveled? In any event, you are probably right and this is as good as any place to stop.”

Related Columns: (Best context reading top to bottom):

Branson marketing genius or ineptitude?

Branson Marketing favoritism, big names and misleading

They are who they are, but does Branson’s marketing have to be what it is?

What’s “damming” Branson shows, prices, marketing or …?

Does quality of the Marketing of Branson shows = the quality of Branson shows? Read More »

What’s “damming” Branson shows, prices, marketing or …?

A recent guest column by Gaye Lisby entitled “Doug Gabriel – home grown, but no hillbilly here” was more about the allegation that a Branson show’s success has “more to do with who gives the lowest ticket prices to the timeshare ticket sales booths and discounters” than whether Gabriel, whom I consider a friend, is either “homegrown” or a “hillbilly.” …

What’s “damming” Branson shows, prices, marketing or …? Read More »

Branson marketing genius or ineptitude?

In these tough times, when many of the shows and attractions in Branson performing day in and day out all season long could benefit from effective marketing, why spend Branson’s limited marketing resources advertising something that is either not in existence, not true or will not be in operation during the specific period being advertised? The April 7 edition of a Springfield News Leader contained a Tab Section published by the State of Missouri entitled “Missouri – enjoy the show VACATION GUIDE Spring Summer 2013 (Tab.)” …

Branson marketing genius or ineptitude? Read More »

Is there enough LUV to pull Branson Airport out of financial doo-doo?

One of the questions commonly asked of the Ole Seagull is, “Will the Branson Airport (Airport) make it?” The gist of his answer is, “I don’t know, but, I hope it does if there is no additional local governmental financing or “bail out” involved.”

But Seagull, “Doesn’t the announcement of Southwest Airlines (LUV) service to Branson reduce the likelihood that additional governmental financing or a “bail out” would be sought by the “Airport?” “Could be, but two things are fact, doo-doo is doo-doo and the LUV service into Branson Airport was formerly confirmed and announced with great fanfare at a Branson Landing Pep Rally in August of 2012. …

Is there enough LUV to pull Branson Airport out of financial doo-doo? Read More »

Is education or raising prices of Branson shows the answer to getting PBIS?

A recent news article reported that the Branson/Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce and CVB did a study on what brings people to Branson and reported the results to the City of Branson’s Board of Aldermen (Board) at a recent meeting. The study’s conclusion, that “Branson’s Shows” is the Number 1 reason people come to Branson, should surprise no one, particularly readers of the column.

Is education or raising prices of Branson shows the answer to getting PBIS? Read More »

It takes “PBIS” for a Branson show to be successful

BRANSON, Mo., July 22, 2012 — It’s no secret, this year has been a really tough year for many shows. Why? Simply put, “There’s not enough ‘PBIS’ (Paid Butts In Seats.) This might seem trite but it is PBIS, the “gross” revenue generated by each “butt” in a seat, that provides theatres and show owners with the major revenue source to pay performers, staff, taxes, operate theatres, costuming, sets, marketing, a myriad of other costs and hopefully, make a “net” profit.

It takes “PBIS” for a Branson show to be successful Read More »